|
|
Please come up with a procedure for processing concurrent T2/T16 disability claims approved at the hearing level. It does not make sense to work down the hearing backlog and then take 5 to 6 months after the hearing to process the claim and send people their back pay. The worse part is you make sure the attorney is paid first and then there is no incentive for the attorney to help the client in getting their back pay. Processing the claim and paying the monthly benefit helps, but most people really need the back pay to get out of debt or save their homes. 5 to 6 months is much much too long to wait!
|
|
|
Our local office refuses to give us information about clients we represent or clients that have provided proper consent for release of Social Security records, unless the client lives in their service area. This makes it more difficult for us to help people resolve their Social Security problems.
Social Security should allow representatives to obtain information about the clients they represent from any office. The agency should make it convenient and easier for the representative and not more difficult.
|
|
|
Open, Transparent? I really do not think Government knows the meaning of either of these two words.
|
|
|
There is much misinformation on what benefits are available to refugee and immigrant populations with many people thinking illegal immigrants are receiving very generous benefits. That should be clarified.
|
|
|
[The following idea came to SSA via an alternative method of public comment. We are posting it because it is of interest. It has been edited, however, to remove personal information. ]
SOCIAL SECURITY ( your open government plan )!. WOULD DO MUCH BETTER, ALONG WITH OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES.! IF THEY FOLLOW UP ON; 1). "" FRAUD COMPLAINTS "... I have proof of the crimes they committed against Agencies of the Federal government. Yet I am left in the dark!; as how to proceed if there is an Investigation in Progress?.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
I would like to propose several issues regarding Social Security.
First, SSA needs a Beneficiary Union to protect and represent the rights beneficiaries with the bureacrats and their political hoodlums and negotiate for better conditions. Labor unions are a protected right, SSA workers belong to one, SSA beneficiaries should have a union to protect themselves against the discriminatory enforcement of bureaucrat, government and worker interests by participating in all SSA negotiations. The fee should be pennies on the monthly check and all employees of the Union should be, or have been, beneficiaries.
Second, as a matter protection against the most vituperous of all serpents, the hog nosed snake, it behooves SSA to transfer responsibility of adjudicating appeals from administrative law judges and lawyers to a panel of social workers and licensed social workers. For their part, the lawyer and former adminisrative law judges should represent SSA before the Federal Court, instead of forfeiting the program integrity to the Department of Justice. Lawyers need to be kept behind bars, they are sociopaths whenever they escape the constant supervision of the Court. Social workers on the other hand are trained to help the poor in their struggle with oppression and, as a rule, would be more professional, compassionate, and understanding. The other appellate change needed is that SSA needs to adjudicate medical malpractice torts. Many beneficiaries could pay for their lifetime of benefits, and then some, disciplining quacks and reforming the health care system. The current system tends to warship health theology and, particularly under the dictatorship of a rather illiterate lawyer, is very vulnerable to abuse by the holy, good snake oil salesmen every other agency is making billions suing, but this money should be going to the victims, SSA needs to adjudicate medical malpractice torts and admit the written petitions of those petitioners who do not want to be fools.
|
|
|
Social Security benefits should not be taxable including but not limited to the lump sum payment make to catch a diasabled person up or back however you look at it. I don't have to pay tax on my benefit (I think anyway as I've not done my taxes yet) however the lump sum is going to make it so I do and on a very limited income that is constantly eroded by medical insurance payment, medicare payment, and other essentials I can barely get the minimum. So for all income levels Soc Sec shouldn't be taxable. Money made elsewhere should be.
This discussion about cutting medicare benefits is extremely concerning. Balancing the budget on the backs of the poor and least able to contribute to political campaigns is abhorable. A new way of doing business is first to do what you are doing which is to seek comment, assuming you use it in some way. As far as the health care issue there are ideas on the ta ble to cut costs in the long run. My idea for a new way of doing business is to include disabled people and those who are disadvantaged in the group of protected species. If you don't those who can one day support themselves will be able to. If you strip away the options to improve their ability to begin to support themselves then it only follows they will be less likely to be able to do so. As far as disabled, many can work however not all so it is important to recognize the difference.
|
|
|
I believe that every entity of government should support open government and freedom of information to ensure the accountability of the agency and the positions in which individuals are selected or hired. No one is above the law or should use power and control as a way to conceal corruption and greed from the American taxpayers. Telephone calls are great but most people prefer face to face meeting even if it is behind a bullet proof glass. Americans need to know that they can trust the government and not feel as though they are at a disadvantage.
|
|
|
I am curious as to how many other recipients of SS benefits feel the same way I do about paying state and federal income taxes on benefits that are actually repayment of after tax payments into social security that were made over a period of 50+ years of work. I will have to draw benefits for many more years before my payments into the fund have been returned to me, not to mention the matching contributions by my employers or any income those contributions should have earned. Yet I have to pay federal income tax on 85 percent of my benefits and state income tax on 100 per cent. How about having the SSA issue statements that show benefits not as income earned but as a refund of previously taxed premiums paid until such time as the payments exceed what the recipient has paid into the fund?
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
[The following idea came to SSA via an alternative method of public comment. We are posting it because it is of interest.]
So what is "the plan"? I would be happy to comment on a draft. Is there a draft plan available? We recently had an opportunity to work with the local social security office and were impressed with the professionalism and efficiency of the staff.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
[The following idea came to SSA via an alternative method of public comment. We are posting it because it is of interest.]
We in state government are bombarded with complaints from our clients as to how frustrating it is to get ahold of you thro the 866 numbers. It would be so much nicer to have local numbers to reach the local office, and maybe have an intake worker each day to help them out.
|
|
|
[The following idea came to SSA via an alternative method of public comment. We are posting it because it is of interest.]
I have no idea what this is about, but considering it is from Social Security and is talking about their open government plan for greater collaboration and transparency it does NOT sound like a good idea. It cannot be good that a government agency like the SSA or IRS would be talking about agency transparency and collaboration. These are two agencies that I would hope would NOT be open, transparent or collaborative. I do NOT want my information shared with anyone. Dressing it up with words like "sunshine", etc doesn't fool anyone. You people just don't get it. If you think a lot of Americans are out of jobs and homes now, just wait until you see how many politicians are out of work come next November.
|
|
|
There needs to be a clear pie chart that shows the various sources of revenue that support the various programs administered by the SSA. Some goes into the Social Security Trust Fund and others come from the US Treasurey's General fund. We are confussed and need a diagram to see the picture clearer.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
I believe SSA is doing a great job in informing people through the Social Security Statement but should continue to evaluate what information is put on the statement. The web site is great and e-filing should be expanded. I would like to see Customer Service expanded by placing SSA employees in community centers along with other fedral and state agencies;also plce emploees or computers in places with a lot of traffic [Mals, Hospitals, Court Houses etc.] Thank you for asking.
|
|
|
I feel the govt should release, and the American public is entitled to know just when, for what, and how much money the govt has taken (since SS's inception) from the SS acccount, to use for funding govt projects that are not SS or SS related. We have all read and heard that the SS fund will be broke, depleated etc at various dates because of out going payments exceeding incoming income, and that the govt has borrowed/moved large amounts of money from the SS fund for other uses, but no where have I ever read the actual amounts of money removed or that any amount at all has been paid back. It is obvious to me, and I am sure to most other SS recipents that this is the reason and it's no wonder the fund is in trouble because of these moves.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
Although I have not been with the agency for 10 years I have noticed quite regularly that whenever individuals learn where I work that a lot of questions arise; most of them not personal in nature. In fact, the questions usually involve very general information - ranging from the way benefits are paid, computed, age requirements for children, etc. The questions are rarely asked by individuals currently or previously receiving any form of Social Security benefits.
As frequently as possible I answer the questions to the best of my knowledge. However, if the questions are beyond my scope of knowledge or relate to a more specific/ personal issue I refer the person to the 800N. What I have noticed is that my answers not only enlighten the individual who posed the question (or made the erroneous statement) but it also enlightens others in or near the conversation.
Therefore my suggestion is to conduct regular town meetings in all of the local field offices. I understand that the field offices experience very long lines and service hundreds daily. I think it would be great idea to host a meeting on a weekly or monthly basis at each field office. Allowing people waiting to be helped the option to participate in a one hour question and answer session with one or two members of the staff. The meeting schedule should be made public to the community via web postings, signage in local businesses and libraries, and/ or flyers. Thereby, informing individuals who have general questions who may not require any services to attend the meeting and have their questions answered. Thus, allowing for regular face-to-face communication between the agency and the general public.
|
|
|
I have met many people who do not know about widow's/widower/s benefits. SSA must do a better job of public education about basic benefit programs people may become entitled to.
|
|
|
I would like open access to information on family members that are missing. Example, i have a brother that the family does not know where he is. We have a birth date but no SSN. We want to know if there is any activity on his account that might tell us if he is alive or deceased.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
My name is Ken and I am an "in the trenches" Service Coordintor with over 150 elderly living in low income housing. As a mature Social Worker (that means I am over the age of 50, and while my title is now Service Coordinator, for 15 years it was Social Worker.)
I provide Seminars for younger Service Coordinators, and Case Workers in public employment and with private agencies (such as Medicare Advantage Plans) with a few other mature Service Coordinators every few months. It is a way to help train the younger ones, and to interact and exchange ideas and experiences. Mentoring would be a good word to use, but I gain also by the ideas that come thru the younger fresh eyes that do my type of work.
I recently brought a publication of Social Security, your SSA Publication No. 05-10147 = When to Start Receiving Returement Benefits.
These people, who work with Social Security, Medicare, Medicare Part D drug plans, etc on a daily if not weekly basis did not know this information about delaying retirement and getting more money per month. I later used this information as the topic for my monthly neighborhood newsletter which I write in my neighborhood regarding issues affecting Senior Adults. I received many many comments about this information.
My point is, this should be added to your home page of Social Security so people considering retirement would know that delaying a year or 2 ,or 3 can reallly help with their retirement income. This could delay retirement, and maybe help Social Security keep some of its money longer???
But, seriously, it is information we need to know. As the Service Coordinator I work with food stamps, MQMB -QMB-SLMB, etc. I have seniors, now age 75 and 80- that retired at age 62, and they just do not get enough money to live well, eat well,and are always worried about money. Their life would be much easier their last years if they would have known to delay retirement2 or 3 years
Please make this information more widely available, esp. in lower income areas of the country,
Ken Williams
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
The public should be able to, in addition to discussing and learning about what's going on in the government, have a direct portal to policy makers. This means their Congressmen, Senators, and administrators.
Citizens could look up their representatives, choose who they want to address, and write letters to them directly from said government information portal.
It would the full utilization of information age.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
today's email from SSA is the first that I have heard of the Open Government Plan invitation to participate with suggestions. This being March 15th leaves only four more days to get involved. A more timely delivery of emails would seem to be in order.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
The current clamor in America cries "Get government out of mour lives."
The fact that without government intervention none of us could survive for a week( food inspections, water purity, electricity generation, licensing of most services we depend on.
So, Social Security must support and participate in informing American of the essential role government plays in our lives, our survival.
If I could offer a sound bite " Without government in our lives, We would have no life".
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
The numbers or percentages of people receving SS or medicare that both have and have not paid into the system shold be posted. We, those that have paid would like to be aware of this. At the very least percetages, of those that have and have not participated and who are receiving benefits.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
It seems odd that when someone is really disabled and has no other source of income or medical benefits that they shouldn't have to wait TWO yeasrs before being allowed to obtain Medicare benefits when they are younger than normal retirement age, if they are truly disabled and this has been varied. WHO made this decision.
Moderator Comments
|
|
|
I would like to see SSA have a calculator that would provide options for potential benefiaries to calculate the best year (0, -1, +2, etc)for THEM to start their SS payments. For instance, if I start at age 62 or 65, when is the "break-even" date of collecting early versus full retirement age. I did my own at full retirement versus 70, and determined that the amount i collected for 4 years would take me up to 20yrs to equal at the higher retirement age amount. However, collecting at age 62 would be a much earlier date. Therefore, I determined that collecting at full retirement age was best for me.
Moderator Comments
|